top of page
Search

COUNCIL REACHES NEW LOW



We have all heard about the $500,000 speed bumps in Auckland, and wondered how it could possibly cost so much to put a foot of asphalt across a street?


Waipa Council, south of Hamilton, has outdone Auckland. In order to create new speed bumps on the main road north out of Cambridge, they actually lowered the road by a foot in height. A year of roadworks and disruption was inflicted on the town to dig up a perfectly good road (it was once part of State Highway One and engineered to carry 30,000 cars per day, but thanks to the Waikato Expressway bypassing the town, it is down to 3,000), including the base courses, to achieve three speed bumps along a 200m section. Perhaps one could be justified as a pedestrian crossing, but how can three can be explained, other than possibly the anti-car fanaticism that seems to have infected councils across the country?


The cost exceeds $1 million per speed bump.


But wait, there is more.


On a return trip a couple of months ago, I personally witnessed the intersection of Hooker Road and Cambridge Road having road markings repainted in the morning, only to drive back in the afternoon to see new seal being laid over the fresh paint. Some council project manager got the order wrong.


But wait again, there is even more!


In 2022, I wrote ‘Council to ban Dogs from Dog Park’, about the actions of Waipa Council. They appear to have faked the legally required consultation process and misled the public? The article resulted in a huge backlash from angry dog owners, forcing the council to back down. There was even a half-hearted apology, which was completely undone when the very next ‘consultation’ excluded many elderly dog-owners by being carried out solely on-line.


It seems they have learned nothing, and their total disrespect of the public has reached a new low.


Cambridge Connections is a program for the next 20 years of town planning, so is hugely important to the residents. The vital decision is the location of a new bridge, but the council seems instead to be using it mainly as an excuse to charge for parking?


Four options were identified for the public, yet the council has already listed them as option A, B, and C. The option of not messing with existing roads and parking is, literally, not an option.


Not that this will make the slightest difference to the consultation process, because the public are only allowed to comment on Option C.


Here is the ENTIRE submission form:


Don’t believe me? I’m not surprised. I didn’t believe it when I was first told. Check it out for yourself.



This is like a North Korean election where you can only vote for Kim Jong Un. Many Cambridge residents who have spoken to me are furious.  Some people are saying there is only one way back from here, and that is to sack the staff involved, but I don’t think the mayor, Susan O’Regan, has even considered this. Are we destined as Ratepayer just to get more of the same but worse?

199 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page